In a landmark decision that could reshape the real‑estate landscape in Mumbai, the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRera) has ordered the promoters of the Kalpataru Yashodhan project in Andheri West to refund a homebuyer couple with a total of ₹1.40 crore plus interest. The ruling, delivered by member Ravindra Deshpande, underscores the authority’s commitment to protecting buyers and signals a stern warning to developers who fail to honour possession timelines.
Background and Context
In 2017, Hina and Sanjay Choksi booked a flat in the Kalpataru Yashodhan project, paying over ₹1.46 crore—roughly 20 % of the total consideration for a unit valued at ₹7.12 crore. The developers promised possession by December 2018, a deadline that was never met. Instead, the promoters issued repeated demand letters, forfeited the entire amount in February 2020, and subsequently sold the same flat to a third party. The couple’s legal representation, led by advocate Dharmendra Damani, filed a complaint with MahaRera alleging breach of contract and unlawful forfeiture.
Under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA), developers are required to provide possession within the stipulated timeline and are prohibited from forfeiting deposits without valid cause. The Chokis’ case highlights a growing trend of developers exploiting contractual loopholes to retain buyer payments while selling units to unrelated parties.
Key Developments
The MahaRera order contains several decisive points:
- Refund Mandate: The promoters must refund ₹1.40 crore to the Chokis, plus interest calculated at the State Bank of India’s highest Marginal Cost of Lending Rate (MCLR) plus 2 % per annum.
- Allottee Status: The authority clarified that any person who has paid a deposit for a unit is an “allottee” under RERA, regardless of whether a formal sale agreement has been executed. This protects buyers from being misclassified as mere investors.
- Unlawful Forfeiture: The forfeiture of the entire deposit was deemed arbitrary, disproportionate, and in direct violation of Section 13 of RERA, which mandates that forfeiture can only occur under specific circumstances.
- Unjust Enrichment: The promoters’ sale of the flat to a third party while retaining the Chokis’ money was ruled as unjust enrichment, a clear breach of statutory duties.
- Premature Demand Letters: The authority found that the demand letters issued before the issuance of an Occupation Certificate were unlawful, as the buyers were still entitled to the remaining consideration.
“Any person to whom an apartment is allotted for consideration is an ‘allottee,’ irrespective of whether an agreement has been executed,” the order states. The ruling emphasizes that developers cannot sidestep their obligations by labeling buyers as investors without evidence of speculative resale.
Impact Analysis
For homebuyers across Mumbai, this decision sends a powerful message:
- Legal Recourse Strengthened: Buyers now have a clearer legal pathway to seek refunds and interest when developers breach possession timelines.
- Developer Accountability: The ruling reinforces that developers cannot arbitrarily forfeit deposits or sell units to third parties without compensating original buyers.
- Market Confidence: By upholding buyer rights, MahaRera is likely to restore confidence in the real‑estate market, encouraging more prudent investment decisions.
- Precedent for Future Cases: The order sets a precedent that could influence similar disputes nationwide, potentially leading to more stringent enforcement of RERA provisions.
For students and young professionals planning to purchase their first home, the ruling underscores the importance of verifying the legal status of a property and ensuring that all contractual obligations are clearly documented.
Expert Insights and Practical Tips
Real‑estate lawyer and RERA specialist, Dr. Anil Mehta, comments: “This ruling is a watershed moment. It clarifies that a deposit alone creates a statutory relationship, and developers must honour possession timelines or face penalties.”
Here are actionable steps for prospective buyers:
- Verify RERA Registration: Ensure the project is registered under RERA and that the developer’s details are listed on the official portal.
- Document All Payments: Keep receipts, bank statements, and any correspondence that confirms your deposit and the promised possession date.
- Read the Agreement Thoroughly: Even if a formal sale agreement is not yet signed, the deposit agreement should outline possession timelines and penalties for delay.
- Seek Legal Counsel Early: If the developer fails to deliver possession within the stipulated period, consult a lawyer experienced in RERA cases promptly.
- File a Complaint with MahaRera: The authority can intervene swiftly, as seen in this case, and order refunds or compensation.
Students and young professionals often face financial constraints. Dr. Mehta advises: “Consider joint ownership or co‑investment with trusted partners to spread risk, but always ensure that the legal framework protects each party’s interests.”
Looking Ahead
The MahaRera decision is likely to trigger a wave of scrutiny across the state’s real‑estate sector. Developers may adopt more transparent practices, such as:
- Issuing clear possession certificates at the earliest possible stage.
- Maintaining separate escrow accounts for buyer deposits to prevent misuse.
- Providing regular updates on construction progress and expected handover dates.
Regulators may also introduce stricter penalties for non‑compliance, including higher fines and mandatory refunds with interest. For buyers, this means a safer investment environment and a stronger legal safety net.
In the broader context, the ruling aligns with the Indian government’s push to protect homebuyers and promote affordable housing. As the real‑estate market continues to evolve, such enforcement actions will play a pivotal role in shaping consumer confidence and industry standards.
Reach out to us for personalized consultation based on your specific requirements.
